dating aeleeta - Carbon 14 dating paper

Reviewer’s comments can be quite varied and range from disinterested to commenting on every single sentence, but are usually thorough and helpful.This constructive criticism, although it can be painful, is extremely valuable and will, in the end, make your paper better.

carbon 14 dating paper-3carbon 14 dating paper-78carbon 14 dating paper-50

Carbon 14 dating paper

Coming at it with fresh eyes helps me see the problems and understand the solutions much better.

Most papers will follow a rather set pattern: Your figures should, if possible, be presented in black and white.

State that you have amended your manuscript thoroughly according to the reviewer’s comments, and that it is much improved as a result.

You now hope that it is suitable for publication in journal AAA.

Your supervisor is the best person to learn writing style. The abstract is possibly the most important part of your paper, and also probably the hardest to write.

Needless to say, your spelling and grammar need to be impeccable. Leave it until last, when you have a clear idea of your paper’s content and outcomes.Your abstract should start with a clear sentence about your motivation; this should summarised your rationale and it should be a ‘call to arms’!This could be followed by what you did; state your aim, because this is how you answered the problem.Then she will send it to peer review, normally to two independent experts in your field.They will read the paper and decide whether it would be publishable, normally dependent on the author revising the manuscript in light of their comments.So, here are some thoughts for people starting to write their first academic paper. Your journal should be peer-reviewed and ISI-linked (so that citations of your work will be counted on databases).

Tags: , ,