Taxation of liquidating

Furthermore, the liquidator is appointed by the Court or the creditor.In a voluntary liquidation, these expenses, along with the cost of appointing an insolvency practitioner, are all covered by the directors.

taxation of liquidating-38taxation of liquidating-42taxation of liquidating-34

We can also assess your situation and recommend an alternative course of action if you’re interested in keeping the company in business.

Friday 16th September, 2016 A well-established tile and bathroom retailer operating primarily in Sussex has been entered into liquidation having become unable to cope with a serious financial crisis in recent weeks.

Although liquidating voluntarily offers a number of advantages, it is important that you also consider the following disadvantages of both forms of liquidation: Liquidating your company voluntarily is more expensive for the directors initially (as they might be asked for a fee) rather than waiting for a creditor or HMRC to force the company into compulsory liquidation.

In a compulsory liquidation the cost of issuing a winding up petition (roughly £1,490-£1,990) is covered by the creditor.

The up front cost of a typical CVL usually ranges from £3000 to £7000, depending on the insolvency practitioner’s rates and the amount of work involved.

However you should be aware that if the company's assets are sufficent to meet these up front costs then the directors should not have to make a personal contribution.After every liquidation process the liquidator is required to investigate all actions taken by the directors while the company was trading insolvently.If it can be shown that the directors did not act in the best interests of creditors then they may be accused of wrongful trading.Sometimes company directors will pursue a voluntary liquidation because “there isn’t enough money to repay all of the debt” or “rescuing the company will be too costly.” While these may seem to be legitimate justifications, the fact still remains that directors are legally obligated to act in the best interests of creditors as a whole.Obviously, hastily ending a company through a CVL is not in the best interest of creditors, as most of the time it results in debts going unpaid.The Internal Revenue Code uses four tests to make this distinction: To prevent gamesmanship among related parties, Congress has added another layer of rules that must be analyzed to determine if a distribution is a redemption.

Tags: , ,